English 9th_Rubric for Digital Report on ICT
- ENGLISH VOYAGE
- 9 abr
- 2 Min. de lectura
Hi there!
Here is the rubric to assess the digital report on ICT. Make sure to meet ALL the criteria.
Criteria | Level 5: Excellent | Level 4: Good | Level 3: Satisfactory | Level 2: Needs Improvement | Level 1: Limited |
1. Editing & Creativity | The report is highly creative and visually appealing. Excellent use of digital tools (images, layout, transitions). | Clear and attractive design. Good use of visuals and editing tools. | Some creativity shown. Basic visuals and editing used. | Limited creativity. Few visuals or editing. | Very plain. No evidence of digital editing or creativity. |
2. Content: Introduction, Pros & Cons, Recommendations (modals) | Clear, complete introduction. Well-structured pros and cons with appropriate expressions. Recommendations include accurate use of modals (should, had better, ought to). | Good introduction. Pros and cons are present with minor errors. Modals are used correctly most of the time. | Basic content is present. Some mistakes in structure or use of modals. | Content is incomplete or poorly organized. Modals used incorrectly. | Lacks structure. Ideas unclear or missing. Modals are absent or incorrect. |
3. Language Use & Vocabulary | Excellent grammar. Rich and appropriate vocabulary related to the topic. | Few grammar errors. Good use of topic-related vocabulary. | Some grammar issues. Basic vocabulary with some topic relevance. | Frequent grammar mistakes. Limited or repetitive vocabulary. | Major grammar issues. Poor or no use of appropriate vocabulary. |
4. Pronunciation & Intonation (in video/audio) | Clear pronunciation and natural intonation. Easy to understand. | Mostly clear. Minor issues with intonation or pronunciation. | Understandable with some effort. Noticeable pronunciation problems. | Hard to follow. Several mispronunciations affect understanding. | Very unclear. Pronunciation prevents understanding. |
5. Collaboration & Teamwork | All members contribute equally. Excellent coordination and shared responsibility. | Most members participate actively. Good coordination. | Uneven participation. Some collaboration visible. | One or two members do most of the work. Weak teamwork. | No evidence of collaboration. Task appears done by one person. |
Keep it up!
Comentarios